Printable Format7-112.
History: L. 1913, ch. 64, § 3; R.S. 1923, § 7-112; Repealed, L. 1968, ch. 303, § 3; March 27.
Source or prior law:
G.S. 1868, ch. 11, § 12.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Effect of failure of accused to appear and answer considered. In re Burnette, 70 Kan. 229, 78 P. 440.
2. Verification of accusation on information and belief; necessity for hearing. In re Burnette, 70 Kan. 229, 78 P. 440.
3. Statutory grounds not exclusive; court has common-law power to disbar. In re Smith, 73 Kan. 743, 85 P. 584.
4. Various defenses considered; form and requisites of accusation and evidence. In re Smith, 73 Kan. 743, 85 P. 584.
5. Grounds for change of venue considered. In re Smith, 73 Kan. 743, 85 P. 584.
6. Accusation considered and held sufficient. In re Hanson, 134 Kan. 165, 166, 5 P.2d 1088.
7. Private attorneys held proper parties to enjoin practice of law by corporation. Depew v. Wichita Retail Credit Ass'n, 141 Kan. 481, 489, 42 P.2d 214.
8. Mentioned; respondents discharged in proceedings in disbarment. In re Ratner, 194 Kan. 362, 399 P.2d 865.