Printable Format66-904.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 23, § 84; R.S. 1923, 66-904; Repealed, L. 1963, ch. 234, § 103; January 1, 1964.
Source or Prior Law:
L. 1864, ch. 124, § 4.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Railroad company trespasser unless proceedings had and money paid previously. M.K. & T. Rly. Co. v. Ward, 10 Kan. 352.
2. When right passes. Blackshire v. A.T. & S.F.R. Co., 13 Kan. 514.
3. Title acquired under law of 1864 was fee simple title. Challis v. A.T. & Santa Fe Rld. Co., 16 Kan. 117.
4. Landowner retains fee of land; right to use land considered. K.C. Rly. Co. v. Allen, 22 Kan. 285.
5. Title remains in landowner; company obtains only amount necessary for railroad. Earlywine v. T.S. & W. Rly. Co., 43 Kan. 746, 23 P. 940.
6. Title to land remains in owner, subject to right of way. Earlywine v. T.S. & W. Rly. Co., 43 Kan. 746, 23 P. 940.
7. Failure to file report does not invalidate condemnation proceedings. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Abbott, 44 Kan. 170, 177, 24 P. 52.
8. Title does not vest in company until railroad fit for use. Railway Co. v. Wilson, 66 Kan. 233, 238, 69 P. 342.
9. Owner has no concurrent right of possession. Dillon v. Railroad Co., 67 Kan. 687, 690, 74 P. 251.
10. Railway company has exclusive right of possession as against stranger. Railway Co. v. Burns, 70 Kan. 627, 79 P. 238.
11. Failure to complete a track; forfeiture of right of way considered. Hamlin v. Railway, 73 Kan. 565, 85 P. 602.
12. Cited in holding pipe-line company cannot abandon condemnation; when. Stewart v. Marland Pipeline Co., 132 Kan. 725, 728, 729, 297 P. 708.
13. Cited in discussing title acquired by railroad in Michigan. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co., 256 Mich. 143, 239 N.W. 376, 378.