Printable Format66-1,112b.
History: L. 1933, ch. 229, § 5; L. 1981, ch. 259, § 2; L. 1982, ch. 275, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 223, § 1; L. 1988, ch. 356, § 234; L. 1995, ch. 98, § 4; Repealed, L. 2003, ch. 124, § 36; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Railroad desiring to transact common motor carrier business must obtain certificate of necessity and convenience; "purposes of this act" discussed. Baldwin v. State Corporation Comm., 143 Kan. 580, 585, 587, 56 P.2d 453.
2. Mentioned; restricted permit violated by private carrier; insurer not relieved of liability. Briggs v. Burk, 172 Kan. 375, 378, 239 P.2d 981.
3. Procedure and standards prescribed as prerequisites to granting contract carrier permits stated and applied; commission's findings upheld; permits properly granted. Class I Rail Carriers v. State Corporation Commission, 191 Kan. 201, 204, 206, 207, 209, 380 P.2d 396.
4. Burden is upon applicant for contract carrier permit to prove that unfair competition is not present. Darnell Truck Service v. State Corporation Commission, 194 Kan. 96, 101, 397 P.2d 385.
5. Allegations that statutes could not be applied to plaintiffs' business did not justify convening three-judge court; question of fact. Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Com'n of Kansas, 223 F. Supp. 975, 977, 978, 981.