Printable Format

Previous | Next

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Property forfeiture provisions (K.S.A. 61-4135) examined; "facilitate" and "owner" defined. State ex rel. Love v. One 1967 Chevrolet, 247 Kan. 469, 470, 799 P.2d 1043 (1990).

2. Trier of fact noted as determining whether forfeiture warranted where vehicle used solely for transporting principals to drug transactions. State v. One 1984 Chevrolet Corvette, 16 Kan. App. 2d 5, 7, 818 P.2d 800 (1991).

3. Failure by prosecution to satisfy statutory notice requirements in serving defendant rendered judgment void; trial court reversed. State v. U.S. Currency in the amount of $3,743.25 Kan. App. 2d 54, 55, 956 P.2d 1351 (1998).