Printable Format65-4153.
History: L. 1981, ch. 140, § 4; L. 1987, ch. 246, § 2; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 237; L. 1996, ch. 257, § 4; L. 2007, ch. 169, § 9; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 32, § 64; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Possession of items for which there was no other reasonable legitimate use was sufficient evidence of intent; distinguished from possession of burglary tools. State v. Dunn, 233 Kan. 411, 412, 413, 662 P.2d 1286 (1983).
2. Seizure of person and pat-down search examined; circumstances determined as insufficient to justify stop and search. State v. Burks, 15 Kan. App. 2d 87, 88, 803 P.2d 587 (1991).
3. Test to determine whether search warrant meets constitutional requirements discussed; specificity, technical irregularities, search by affiant examined. State v. LeFort, 248 Kan. 332, 334, 806 P.2d 986 (1991).
4. Insufficient evidence to support conviction of faux crack cocaine. State v. Marion, 29 Kan. App. 2d 287, 27 P.3d 924 (2001).