Printable Format65-2602.
History: L. 1957, ch. 339, § 2; L. 1970, ch. 259, § 2; Repealed, L. 1972, ch. 234, § 41; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Evidence held sufficient to establish violation of statute. State v. McCollum, 209 Kan. 498, 499, 496 P.2d 1381.
2. Conviction hereunder reversed; defenses of entrapment and procuring agent are not inconsistent. State v. Fitzgibbon, 211 Kan. 553, 554, 507 P.2d 313.
3. Appeal from conviction hereunder; evidence held sufficient to warrant instruction to jury on defense of entrapment. State v. Farmer, 212 Kan. 163, 510 P.2d 180.
4. Conviction hereunder upheld; state need not prove defendant was not an exempt person hereunder. State v. Brothers, 212 Kan. 187, 189, 510 P.2d 608.
5. Conviction hereunder affirmed; burden on defendant to show exception to statute as defense; proper foundation for admission of drug exhibit considered. State v. White, 213 Kan. 276, 279, 515 P.2d 1081.
6. Conviction hereunder; record examined; no error. State v. Carter, 214 Kan. 533, 534, 535, 521 P.2d 294.