Printable Format65-1010.
History: L. 1937, ch. 270, § 1; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 343, § 91; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; city ordinance regulating barbers in conflict with state law held invalid. Trimble v. City of Topeka, 147 Kan. 111, 117, 75 P.2d 241.
2. Act does not violate state or federal constitution; injunction properly granted. State, ex rel., v. Cooper, 147 Kan. 710, 716, 78 P.2d 884.
3. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Gleason, 148 Kan. 1, 2, 15, 79 P.2d 911. Rehearing denied: 148 Kan. 458, 84 P.2d 48. Opinion on post-decision motions: 148 Kan. 459, 83 P.2d 425.
4. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Moore, 154 Kan. 193, 117 P.2d 598.
5. Judgment and sentence for indirect contempt for violating injunction upheld. State v. Martin, 155 Kan. 801, 804, 130 P.2d 601.
6. Contempt proceeding for violation of injunction; necessary proof and pleadings. State, ex rel., v. Wilson, 162 Kan. 507, 514, 178 P.2d 277.
7. Action to enjoin from unlawful practice properly maintained by county attorney. State, ex rel., v. Leopold, 170 Kan. 613, 615, 616, 228 P.2d 538.