Printable Format65-1005.
History: L. 1901, ch. 254, § 6; L. 1908, ch. 63, § 1; L. 1913, ch. 290, § 10; R.S. 1923, 65-1005; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 343, § 91; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Use of "domestic medicines" no defense where fee accepted. State v. Huff, 75 Kan. 585, 90 P. 279.
2. Sufficiency of information under this section considered. State v. Buis, 83 Kan. 273, 111 P. 189.
3. Legislature may regulate practice of any healing art; chiropractic. State v. Johnson, 84 Kan. 411, 421, 114 P. 390.
4. Treating sick by "suggestive therapeutics" held within provisions of act. State v. Peters, 87 Kan. 265, 123 P. 751.
5. Statute penalizes each specific act of practice. State v. Cotner, 87 Kan. 864, 866, 127 P. 1.
6. Duty of attending physician; practice of surgery by osteopath. Yard v. Gibbons, 95 Kan. 802, 810, 149 P. 422.
7. Application of act to osteopathic physicians and chiropractic practitioners considered. State v. Snodgrass, 96 Kan. 604, 152 P. 624.
8. Osteopathy is not comprehended within term "practicing medicine." State, ex rel., v. Eustace, 117 Kan. 746, 748, 233 P. 109.
9. Words "sick or" as used in statute construed. State v. Douglas, 124 Kan. 482, 484, 260 P. 655.
10. What constitutes "practicing medicine" discussed. Slocum v. City of Fredonia, 134 Kan. 853, 856, 8 P.2d 332.
11. Evidence sustained finding defendant was engaged in medical practice; injunction. State, ex rel., v. Cooper, 147 Kan. 710, 711, 714, 715, 78 P.2d 884.
12. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Gleason, 148 Kan. 1, 6, 8, 14, 79 P.2d 911. Rehearing denied: 148 Kan. 458, 84 P.2d 48. Opinion on post-decision motions: 148 Kan. 459, 83 P.2d 425.
13. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Moore, 154 Kan. 193, 204, 117 P.2d 598.
14. Practice of medicine defined; not limited to prescribing of drugs. State v. Martin, 155 Kan. 801, 130 P.2d 601.
15. Osteopaths held not entitled to federal narcotic licenses. Burke v. Kansas State Osteopathic Association, 111 F.2d 250.
16. Section as construed by Kansas supreme court is constitutional. Gleason v. Carlson, 98 F. Supp. 280.