KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

65-1005.

History: L. 1901, ch. 254, § 6; L. 1908, ch. 63, § 1; L. 1913, ch. 290, § 10; R.S. 1923, 65-1005; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 343, § 91; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Use of "domestic medicines" no defense where fee accepted. State v. Huff, 75 Kan. 585, 90 P. 279.

2. Sufficiency of information under this section considered. State v. Buis, 83 Kan. 273, 111 P. 189.

3. Legislature may regulate practice of any healing art; chiropractic. State v. Johnson, 84 Kan. 411, 421, 114 P. 390.

4. Treating sick by "suggestive therapeutics" held within provisions of act. State v. Peters, 87 Kan. 265, 123 P. 751.

5. Statute penalizes each specific act of practice. State v. Cotner, 87 Kan. 864, 866, 127 P. 1.

6. Duty of attending physician; practice of surgery by osteopath. Yard v. Gibbons, 95 Kan. 802, 810, 149 P. 422.

7. Application of act to osteopathic physicians and chiropractic practitioners considered. State v. Snodgrass, 96 Kan. 604, 152 P. 624.

8. Osteopathy is not comprehended within term "practicing medicine." State, ex rel., v. Eustace, 117 Kan. 746, 748, 233 P. 109.

9. Words "sick or" as used in statute construed. State v. Douglas, 124 Kan. 482, 484, 260 P. 655.

10. What constitutes "practicing medicine" discussed. Slocum v. City of Fredonia, 134 Kan. 853, 856, 8 P.2d 332.

11. Evidence sustained finding defendant was engaged in medical practice; injunction. State, ex rel., v. Cooper, 147 Kan. 710, 711, 714, 715, 78 P.2d 884.

12. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Gleason, 148 Kan. 1, 6, 8, 14, 79 P.2d 911. Rehearing denied: 148 Kan. 458, 84 P.2d 48. Opinion on post-decision motions: 148 Kan. 459, 83 P.2d 425.

13. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Moore, 154 Kan. 193, 204, 117 P.2d 598.

14. Practice of medicine defined; not limited to prescribing of drugs. State v. Martin, 155 Kan. 801, 130 P.2d 601.

15. Osteopaths held not entitled to federal narcotic licenses. Burke v. Kansas State Osteopathic Association, 111 F.2d 250.

16. Section as construed by Kansas supreme court is constitutional. Gleason v. Carlson, 98 F. Supp. 280.


 | Next


LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL
  12/17/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  12/02/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  11/14/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  10/23/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  09/09/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  08/21/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda

  LCC Policies

REVISOR OF STATUTES
  Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
  Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act
  Gannon v. State
  A Summary of Special Sessions in Kansas
  Bill Brief for Senate Bill No. 1
  Bill Brief for House Bill No. 2001
  2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill
  2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA
  2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill
  2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA
USEFUL LINKS
Session Laws

OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES
Kansas Legislature
Administrative Services
Division of Post Audit
Research Department