Printable Format65-701.
History: L. 1927, ch. 242, § 2; L. 1990, ch. 219, § 1; Repealed, L. 2001, ch. 32, § 24; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
L. 1907, ch. 404, § 2; L. 1909, ch. 237, § 2; R.S. 1923, 65-701.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Purpose of act discussed; dicta. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 143 Kan. 117, 122, 53 P.2d 878.
2. Purpose of act discussed. Associated Dairies v. Fletcher, 143 Kan. 561, 565, 56 P.2d 106; Wichita Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. Capp, 144 Kan. 238, 59 P.2d 29.
3. Cited in holding filled-milk statute (K.S.A. 65-707, paragraph 2, subsection F) constitutional. Carolene Products Co. v. Mohler, 152 Kan. 2, 8, 102 P.2d 1044.
4. State dairy commissioner's duty to enforce act; power of state board of health. State v. Reynolds, 152 Kan. 762, 763, 766, 767, 107 P.2d 728.
5. Act cited in upholding city ordinance levying inspection fee against milk producers. Dorssom v. City of Atchison, 155 Kan. 225, 227, 124 P.2d 475.
6. Act cited in upholding city ordinance levying inspection fee against milk distributors. City of Beloit v. Lamborn, 182 Kan. 288, 290, 321 P.2d 177.
7. Cited; statutory system where Kansas board of agriculture is elected by farm organization delegates violates equal protection. Hellebust v. Brownback, 824 F. Supp. 1511, 1513 (1993).