60-1608.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1608; L. 1970, ch. 239, § 1; L. 1977, ch. 204, § 3; L. 1981, ch. 235, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 152, § 8; L. 1991, ch. 171, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 186, § 1; L. 1997, ch. 173, § 31; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 26, § 47; July 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1913, ch. 234, § 4; R.S. 1923, 60-1517.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Divorce and Alimony Under the New Code," Dan Hopson, Jr., 12 K.L.R. 27, 31 (1963).
Comment concerning the incompatibility divorce, 14 W.L.J. 349, 352 (1975).
"Survey of Kansas Law: Family Law," Camilla Klein Haviland, 27 K.L.R. 241, 243, 249 (1979).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
Prior law cases, see G.S. 1949, 60-1517 and the 1961 Supp. thereto.
1. Referred to in upholding findings that evidence supported granting of divorce on grounds of incompatibility; no abuse of discretion. Berry v. Berry, 215 K. 47, 51, 523 P.2d 342.
2. Motion for order hereunder denied; divorce granted for incompatibility supported by evidence. North v. North, 217 K. 213, 535 P.2d 914.
3. Public policy favors marriage (concurring opinion). Hill v. Hill, 228 K. 680, 689, 620 P.2d 1114.