Printable Format44-106.
History: L. 1903, ch. 356, § 6; R.S. 1923, 44-106; Repealed, L. 1978, ch. 191, § 3; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Violation of duty imposed prima facie sufficient to establish liability. Brick Co. v. Stark, 77 Kan. 648, 95 P. 1047.
2. Evidence showing necessity of guard establishes negligence of defendant. Brick Co. v. Fisher, 79 Kan. 576, 578, 100 P. 507.
3. Liability established by showing failure to establish safeguards. Caspar v. Lewin, 82 Kan. 604, 109 P. 657; Bubb, Adm'x, v. Railway Co., 89 Kan. 303, 306, 131 P. 575.
4. Cited; defendant need not plead manner of compliance with act, when. Bortzfield v. Sutton, 180 Kan. 46, 49, 299 P.2d 584.