38-1524.
History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 21; L. 1983, ch. 140, § 21; L. 1988, ch. 138, § 4; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Immigration Law and Policy: A History of Judicial Deference, and the Effect of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986," Susan Gentry Saidian and Susana Valdovinos-Hall, 27 W.L.J. 601, 614 (1988).
"Protecting the protectors: The public duty doctrine," David C. Kresin, 67 J.K.B.A. No. 8, 22 (1998).
Attorney General's Opinions:
School attendance, curriculum and accreditation; responsibility to investigate home instruction. 85-159.
Child under 18 taken into custody by law enforcement officers; transfer of custody; order of court. 98-4.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Whether state agencies owed duty to individual plaintiff day care owners for KTCA (K.S.A. 75-6101 et seq.) liability purposes examined. P.W. v. Kansas Dept. of SRS, 255 Kan. 827, 835, 877 P.2d 430 (1994).
2. SRS employees determining whether to investigate child abuse allegations are involved in a discretionary act for KTCA (K.S.A. 75-6101 et seq.) purposes. Beebe v. Fraktman, 22 Kan. App. 2d 493, 495, 921 P.2d 216 (1996).
3. SRS did not owe duty to alleged child abuser during investigation for negligence purposes. Burney v. Kansas Dept. of SRS, 23 Kan. App. 2d 394, 399, 931 P.2d 26 (1997).
|
|