38-402.
History: L. 1905, ch. 190, § 2; R.S. 1923, 38-402; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 256, § 39; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. "Delinquent child" includes child under sixteen who violates law. State v. Dubray, 121 Kan. 886, 888, 250 P. 316.
2. Juvenile court act does not apply to inmates of institutions. State v. Dubray, 121 Kan. 886, 896, 250 P. 316.
3. Section cited in considering sufficiency of petition filed in juvenile court. In re Hollis, 124 Kan. 345, 347, 259 P. 793.
4. Case tried de novo subject to limitations of juvenile court. Hollis v. Brownell, 129 Kan. 818, 820, 821, 284 P. 388.
5. Evidence held insufficient to support finding that child was dependent and neglected. McGrath v. Vail, 140 Kan. 312, 317, 37 P.2d 3.
6. Act valid although inapplicable to inmates of Boys' Industrial School. Burris v. Board of Administration, 156 Kan. 600, 602, 603, 604, 606, 134 P.2d 649.
7. Divorce jurisdiction over child lost when juvenile court acquires jurisdiction hereunder. Trent v. Bellamy, 164 Kan. 438, 439, 442, 443, 446, 190 P.2d 400.
8. Substantial evidence of child's dependency, neglect or delinquency essential to court's jurisdiction. Trent v. Bellamy, 164 Kan. 438, 439, 442, 443, 446, 190 P.2d 400.
9. Juvenile court's jurisdiction to determine whether child delinquent is exclusive. Houser v. Houser, 166 Kan. 45, 47, 199 P.2d 497.
10. Escapee from industrial school while absent therefrom is still inmate thereof. Seibert v. Ferguson, 167 Kan. 128, 130, 131, 132, 134, 135, 137, 205 P.2d 484.
11. Record reviewed; findings and judgment of dependency and neglect upheld. In re Watson, 177 Kan. 666, 667, 281 P.2d 1116.
12. Juvenile court act inapplicable to inmates of penal institutions. LaVier v. State, 214 Kan. 287, 291, 292, 520 P.2d 1325.
|
|