23-36,101. Citation of act. This act may be cited as the uniform interstate family support act.
History: L. 1994, ch. 301, § 32; L. 1997, ch. 182, § 32; L. 2015, ch. 64, § 1; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
23-9,101, 23-9,902, 23-36,902.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Challenging the Presumption of Paternity," Sheila Reynolds, 65 J.K.B.A. No. 10, 36 (1996).
"Conflict of Laws in Kansas: A Guide to Navigating the Dismal Swamp," Terri Savely Bezek, 71 J.K.B.A. No. 8, 21 (2002).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Issuing state loses jurisdiction to modify child support when children and parties have left state; reversible error to deny motion to register support order in another state. In re Marriage of Abplanalp, 27 Kan. App. 2d 833, 7 P.3d 1269 (2000).
2. Where both parties to divorce have left state, Kansas court has subject jurisdiction to enforce its child support order, but motion to modify child support should be forwarded to state having personal jurisdiction. In re Marriage of Metz, 31 Kan. App. 2d 623, 69 P.3d 1128 (2003).
3. Cited; consensual appointment of permanent guardian under K.S.A. 38-1587 does not terminate parent's obligation to support child. State ex rel. Secretary of SRS v. Bohrer, 286 Kan. 898, 899, 189 P.3d 1157 (2008).
4. Provisions of uniform interstate family support act interpreted and applied; attorney fees and interest award affirmed. In re Marriage of Ormsbee, 39 Kan. App. 2d 715, 718, 186 P.3d 806 (2008).
5. Germany treated as a state for UIFSA purposes in Kansas; German support orders may be registered and enforced in Kansas. Dia v. Oakley, 42 Kan. App. 2d 847, 217 P.3d 1010 (2009).
|
|