KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

22-3608. Time for appeal from judgment of district court. (a) If sentence is imposed, the defendant may appeal from the judgment of the district court not later than 10 days after the expiration of the district court's power to modify the sentence. The power to revoke or modify the conditions of probation or the conditions of assignment to a community correctional services program shall not be deemed power to modify the sentence. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993.

(b) If the imposition of sentence is suspended, the defendant may appeal from the judgment of the district court within 10 days after the order suspending imposition of sentence. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993.

(c) For crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993, the defendant shall have 14 days after the judgment of the district court to appeal.

History: L. 1970, ch. 129, § 22-3608; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 23; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 264; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 197; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 28; July 1.

Source or Prior Law:

62-1724.

Cross References to Related Sections:

Time limit for modification of sentence, crimes committed prior to July 1, 1993, see 21-4603.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

Appeal time limits discussed in "Collateral Challenges to Criminal Convictions," Keith G. Meyer and Larry W. Yackle, 21 K.L.R. 259, 264, 319 (1973).

"Practicing Law in a Unified Kansas Court System," Linda Diane Henry Elrod, 16 W.L.J. 260, 271 (1977).

Survey of Recent Cases, 43 K.L.R. 1003 (1995).

"Kansas Appellate Advocacy: An Inside View of Common-Sense Strategy," Patrick Hughes, 66 J.K.B.A. No. 2, 26 (1997).

"Habeas Corpus in Kansas: The Great Writ Affords Postconviction Relief at K.S.A. 60-1507," Martha J. Coffman, 67 J.K.B.A. No. 1, 16 (1998).

Criminal Procedure Survey, 56 K.L.R. 799 (2008).

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Failure to file appeal within time prescribed by this section and K.S.A. 21-4603; appeal dismissed. State v. Thompson, 221 Kan. 165, 166, 167, 558 P.2d 93.

2. Applied; appeal from conviction of aggravated robbery not filed within statutory time. State v. Smith, 223 Kan. 47, 573 P.2d 985.

3. Appeal from order suspending imposition of sentence timely filed; denial of motion for acquittal proper. State v. Brady, 2 Kan. App. 2d 382, 383, 580 P.2d 434. Syl ¶2 and corresponding statements in Brady opinion overruled. State v. Moses, 227 Kan. 400, 403, 607 P.2d 477.

4. Appeal dismissed; sentence must be imposed or imposition of sentence suspended in order to have a final appealable judgment. City of Topeka v. Martin, 3 Kan. App. 2d 105, 590 P.2d 106.

5. Appeal dismissed; appeal not timely filed under this section and K.S.A. 21-4603. State v. Moses, 227 Kan. 400, 401, 404, 607 P.2d 477.

6. Cited; no right of appeal from denial of sentence modification motion filed more than 130 days after sentencing. State v. Henning, 3 Kan. App. 2d 607, 608, 599 P.2d 318.

7. Jurisdiction lacking for appeal of conviction of involuntary manslaughter; sentence deferred, not suspended. State v. Lottman, 6 Kan. App. 2d 741, 742, 633 P.2d 1178 (1981).

8. Filing of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional; appeal not taken within time prescribed must be dismissed; exception to general rule noted. State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 735, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982).

9. Trial court's jurisdiction ends when appeal docketed; modification of sentence only upon mandate of appellate court or upon remand. State v. Dedman, 230 Kan. 793, 796, 640 P.2d 1266 (1982).

10. Time limits set herein applicable to imposition of sentence not to modification of probation conditions. State v. Yost, 232 Kan. 370, 372, 654 P.2d 458 (1982).

11. Cited in deciding that prosecution's appeal time under K.S.A. 22-3602(b) covered by K.S.A. 60-2103. State v. Freeman, 236 Kan. 274, 276, 689 P.2d 885 (1984).

12. Limitation on appeal by criminal defendant linked to time court may modify sentence. State v. Myers, 10 Kan. App. 2d 266, 269, 697 P.2d 879 (1985).

13. Appeal of conviction must be within time periods herein and K.S.A. 21-4603, regardless of probation and subsequent revocation. State v. Tripp, 237 Kan. 244, 246, 699 P.2d 33 (1985).

14. Cited; denial of motion allowing late filing of appeal where no indication to appeal found in record examined. State v. Cook, 12 Kan. App. 2d 309, 310, 741 P.2d 379 (1987).

15. Cited; appeal times controlling with and without imposition of sentence (K.S.A. 21-4603) determined. State v. Wagner, 242 Kan. 329, 747 P.2d 114 (1987).

16. Time limits on district court's jurisdiction to modify sentences and exceptions thereto (K.S.A. 21-4603(3)) examined. State v. Saft, 244 Kan. 517, 520, 769 P.2d 675 (1989).

17. Direct appeal at any time from sentence imposed when purpose is to challenge legality of sentence examined. State v. D.L.P., 13 Kan. App. 2d 647, 649, 778 P.2d 851 (1989).

18. Piecemeal appeals as frowned upon noted; appeal must be filed within statutory time allowed. State v. Neer, 247 Kan. 137, 140, 795 P.2d 362 (1990).

19. Error to find defendant advised of appeal rights solely through judicial notice of defendant's experienced counsel; late appeal allowed. State v. McDaniel, 249 Kan. 341, 344, 345, 819 P.2d 1165 (1991).

20. Period for timely filing notice of appeal from judgment of magistrate court (K.S.A. 22-3609a) examined. State v. Wilson, 15 Kan. App. 2d 308, 311, 808 P.2d 434 (1991).

21. Exception to time limit if defendant's attorney fails to perfect and complete appeal. State v. Irvin, 16 Kan. App. 2d 214, 216, 821 P.2d 1019 (1991).

22. Whether defendant's failure to raise an issue in a first trial or appeal bars raising the issue in subsequent trial examined. State v. Cady 254 Kan. 393, 401, 867 P.2d 270 (1994).

23. Whether defendant timely filed notice of appeal of judge's refusal to modify sentence examined. State v. Ji, 255 Kan. 101, 103, 872 P.2d 748 (1994).

24. Whether court's failure to advise defendant of appeal rights warranted permitting untimely appeal examined. State v. Redmon, 255 Kan. 220, 222, 873 P.2d 1350 (1994).

25. Whether a municipal court judgment requires both conviction and sentencing to be appealable examined. City of Halstead v. Mayfield, 19 Kan. App. 2d 186, 865 P.2d 222 (1994).

26. Whether second motion to modify sentence after first denied must be filed within 120 days of conviction examined. State v. Hervey, 19 Kan. App. 2d 498, 500, 873 P.2d 188 (1994).

27. Time frame in which appeal of denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea must be taken examined. State v. McDaniel, 255 Kan. 756, 760, 762, 877 P.2d 961 (1994).

28. Whether case should be remanded to determine why appeal from denial of sentence modification was untimely perfected examined. State v. Medina, 256 Kan. 695, 700, 887 P.2d 105 (1994).

29. Whether appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider new issues raised in untimely amended notice of appeal examined. State v. Grant, 19 Kan. App. 2d 686, 689, 875 P.2d 986 (1994).

30. Whether filing notice of appeal divests trial court of jurisdiction to hear motion to modify sentence examined. State v. Gibbons, 256 Kan. 951, 966, 889 P.2d 772 (1995).

31. For cases decided before KSGA (K.S.A. 21-4701 et seq.) time for notice of appeal commences from date sentence is orally announced. State v. Bost, 21 Kan. App. 2d 560, 563, 903 P.2d 160 (1995).

32. Suspension of imposition of sentence in felony cases not allowed under KSGA 21-4701 (et seq.). State v. Soto, 22 Kan. App. 2d 154, 928 P.2d 103 (1996).

33. Incorrectly characterized motion to correct clerical and arithmetic errors considered motion to modify sentence for appellate jurisdiction purposes. State v. McBride, 23 Kan. App. 2d 302, 303, 930 P.2d 618 (1996).

34. Appeal filed untimely allowed under fundamental fairness exception; defendant furnished with attorney who failed to perfect appeal. City of Dodge City v. Hadley, 262 Kan. 234, 936 P.2d 1347 (1997).

35. Right to appeal criminal conviction entirely statutory; court accepts untimely appeal finding an exception to statutory requirement citing Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733. State v. Flynn, 274 Kan. 473, 55 P.3d 324 (2002).

36. Defendant not permitted to appeal out of time; no Ortiz exception found. State v. Mitchell, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1090, 54 P.3d 969 (2002).

37. Suspending imposition of sentence does not alter effective date of sentencing for purposes of appeal. City of Wichita v. Smith, 31 Kan. App. 2d 837, 75 P.3d 1228 (2003).

38. Appeal not taken within 10-day period provided by section must be dismissed; exception to rule may apply if narrow circumstances in State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, exist. State v. Phinney, 280 Kan. 394, 122 P.3d 356 (2005).

39. Motion to correct illegal sentence not barred by statutory 10-day period. State v. Flores, 283 Kan. 380, 384, 153 P.3d 506 (2007).

40. Late appeal filed under Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, subject to law in effect at time of granting. State v. Thomas, 283 Kan. 796, 805, 156 P.3d 1261 (2007).

41. None of the exceptions in State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982) exist to allow defendant's appeal out of time. State v. Scoville, 37 Kan. App. 2d 341, 345, 152 P.3d 1262 (2007).

42. Appeal not taken within 10-day period must be dismissed. Casner v. State, 37 Kan. App. 2d 667, 673, 155 P.3d 1202 (2007).

43. Cited in case remanded for hearings on motion to withdraw plea and to appeal sentence out of time. State v. Hemphill, 286 Kan. 583, 588, 590, 186 P.3d 777 (2008).

44. Cited in case where direct appeal filed out of time was permitted. State v. Scoville, 286 Kan. 800, 802, 188 P.3d 959 (2008).

45. Cited; imposition of BIDS attorney fees must be appealed within 10 days of judgment otherwise no appellate jurisdiction. State v. Ehrlich, 286 Kan. 923, 925, 189 P.3d 491 (2008).

46. Cited; appeal right is statutory; timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Barr v. State, 287 Kan. 190, 193, 196 P.3d 357 (2008).

47. Cited; timely notice of criminal appeals; three Ortiz exceptions discussed and applied. State v. Patton, 287 Kan. 200, 206, 195 P.3d 753 (2008).

48. Cited; defendant required to prove timely appeal would have been sought had defendant been properly informed of appeal right. State v. Gill, 287 Kan. 289, 294, 196 P.3d 369 (2008).


 | Next


LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL
  10/23/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  09/09/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  08/21/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda

  LCC Policies

REVISOR OF STATUTES
  Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
  Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act
  Gannon v. State
  A Summary of Special Sessions in Kansas
  Bill Brief for Senate Bill No. 1
  Bill Brief for House Bill No. 2001
  2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill
  2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA
  2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill
  2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA
USEFUL LINKS
Session Laws

OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES
Kansas Legislature
Administrative Services
Division of Post Audit
Research Department