21-4729.
History: L. 2003, ch. 135, § 1; L. 2006, ch. 211, § 7; L. 2009, ch. 32, § 39; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Statute sets forth grounds when offender's probation must be revoked; not the exclusive grounds for revocation. State v. Gumfory, 281 Kan. 1168, 1174, 135 P.3d 1191 (2006).
2. Cited; no jail time credit for time in inpatient treatment required by mandatory drug abuse treatment program. State v. Preston, 287 Kan. 181, 185, 186, 195 P.3d 240 (2008).
3. Conviction under K.S.A. 65-4160(a) and applicability of K.S.A. 21-4729(a)(1) and (2) requires sentence for certified drug abuse treatment program. State v. Bee, 39 Kan. App. 2d 139 to 148, 179 P.3d 466 (2008).
4. Cited; section addresses duration of the term of drug treatment. State v. Holt, 39 Kan. App. 2d 741, 742, 744, 745, 186 P.3d 803 (2008).
5. Cited; court not required to impose a nonprison sentence even when such sentence is presumed, when. State v. Andelt, 40 Kan. App. 2d 796 to 799, 195 P.3d 1220 (2008).
6. Defendant who fails to participate in ordered drug abuse treatment program is subject to serve underlying prison sentence. State v. Bee, 288 Kan. 733, 207 P.3d 244 (2009).
7. Drug treatment programs mandatory for individuals who qualify under K.S.A. 21-4729. State v. Andelt, 289 Kan. 763, 217 P.3d 976 (2009).
8. Drug treatment sanction trumps the prison sanction outlined in K.S.A. 21-4603d (f)(3). State v. Casey, 42 Kan. App. 2d 309, 211 P.3d 847 (2009).
9. The court is not required to order drug treatment for a violation of K.S.A. 21-3301. State v. Perry-Coutcher, 45 Kan. App. 2d 911, 254 P.3d 556 (2011).
|
|