21-4607.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4607; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 8; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Cross References to Related Sections:
Authorized fines, see 21-4503, 21-4503a.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Creative Punishment: A Study of Effective Sentencing Alternatives," David F. Fisher, 14 W.L.J. 57, 71 (1975).
"Decisions, Decisions, Decisions," Terry L. Bullock, 17 W.L.J. 26, 27 (1977).
"A Comment on Kansas' New Drunk Driving Law," Joseph Brian Cox and Donald G. Strole, 51 J.K.B.A. 230, 232 (1982).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in holding legislative intent is imposition of mandatory minimum sentence when firearm used, K.S.A. 21-4618. State v. Keeley, 236 Kan. 555, 559, 694 P.2d 422 (1985).
2. When considering fines, court must also consider provisions herein. State v. Scherer, 11 Kan. App. 2d 362, 370, 721 P.2d 743 (1986).
3. Cited; specific findings required of court before imposing fine examined. State v. McGlothlin, 242 Kan. 437, 747 P.2d 1335 (1988).
4. When court must consider defendant's financial ability to reimburse state for defense services under K.S.A. 21-4610(4)(c) determined. State v. Crawford, 248 Kan. 42, 47, 804 P.2d 1385 (1991).
5. Court must make specific findings pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3) before imposing a fine. State v. McNett, 15 Kan. App. 2d 291, 293, 807 P.2d 171 (1991).
6. Where judge imposes fine beyond minimum mandatory amount stated in K.S.A. 8-1567, judge must comply with K.S.A. 21-4607. State v. Shuster, 17 Kan. App. 2d 8, 10, 829 P.2d 925 (1992).
7. Whether municipal judge has authority to order defendant to reimburse city for appointed counsel examined. City of Dodge City v. Anderson, 20 Kan. App. 2d 272, 273, 886 P.2d 901 (1994).
8. In imposing fine court failed to make findings regarding defendant's financial resources and burden fine would have on defendant. State v. Shively, 26 Kan. App. 2d 302, 315, 987 P.2d 1119 (1999).
9. Court must state on record consideration of financial resources of defendant before imposing fine. State v. Edwards, 27 Kan. App. 2d 754, 9 P.3d 568 (2000).
10. Fine vacated, trial court did not make the required findings to support the fine. State v. Bastian, 37 Kan. App. 2d 156, 164, 150 P.3d 912 (2007).
11. Court set fine at $2,500 but did not make findings required by K.S.A. 21-4607. State v. Dukes, 38 Kan. App. 2d 958, 964, 174 P.3d 914 (2008).
12. Cited; requirement of K.S.A. 21-4607 to consider defendant's financial resources not applicable when minimum fine imposed. State v. Wenzel, 39 Kan. App. 2d 194, 202, 177 P.3d 994 (2008).
13. Interaction with the mandatory fine provision in K.S.A. 21-3710 examined. State v. Raschke, 289 Kan. 911, 219 P.3d 481 (2009).
14. District court should have made specific findings when imposing both a fine and a jail term. State v. Adame, 45 Kan. App. 2d 1124, 257 P.3d 1266 (2011).
|
|