21-4209.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4209; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 71; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 152; L. 1994, ch. 348, § 15; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Source or Prior Law:
21-2445.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Survey of Kansas Law: Consumer Law," 29 K.L.R. 483, 490 (1981).
"Comparative Fault: Should a 'Pure' or 'Modified' Form Apply to Strict Liability Cases" Lynn R. Johnson, 5 J.K.T.L.A. No. 1, 21, 22 (1981).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Comparative negligence statute held applicable to injury received as result of proscribed sale of explosive to minor. Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc., 227 Kan. 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 848, 849, 850, 610 P.2d 1107.
2. Application of doctrine of comparative negligence considered. Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiegesellschaft, 230 Kan. 368, 372, 634 P.2d 1127 (1981).
3. Cited by dissent where majority held that absent legislation, suppliers of alcohol are not liable to victims of intoxicated persons. Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 237 Kan. 629, 646, 703 P.2d 731 (1985).
4. Application of negligence per se doctrine examined. Schlobohm v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 248 Kan. 122, 124, 804 P.2d 967 (1991).
5. Cited in dissent to ruling that absent authorization no private right of action granted where statute enacted for public protection. Kansas State Bank & Tr. Co. v. Specialized Transportation Services, Inc., 249 Kan. 348, 387, 819 P.2d 587 (1991).
6. Noted where statutes prohibiting and regulating sale of liquor to minors held to not impose civil liability. Mills v. City of Overland Park, 251 Kan. 434, 440, 837 P.2d 370 (1992).
7. Noted in discussion of how far back prior termination of parental rights should be considered in applying subsequent unfitness presumption. In re J.L., 20 Kan. App. 2d 665, 673, 891 P.2d 1125 (1995).
8. Criminal firearm statutes support holding that person owes a public duty to store hand gun in prudent manner. Long v. Turk, 265 Kan. 855, 864, 962 P.2d 1093 (1998).
|
|