21-3815.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3815; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 159; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 108; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Source or Prior Law:
21-712, 21-746.
Attorney General's Opinions:
Victim impact statement does not attempt to improperly influence judge. 96-13.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Section construed; not constitutionally impermissible. State v. Torline, 215 Kan. 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 545, 527 P.2d 994.
2. Term "with intent to improperly influence" construed; evidence insufficient to sustain conviction. State v. Torline, 215 Kan. 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 545, 527 P.2d 994.
3. On certified question, Kansas does not recognize a common law tort action for embracery; expert witness misconduct discussed. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Howell, 260 Kan. 305, 320, 340, 918 P.2d 1274 (1996).
4. Defendants sent letter to judge suggesting leniency toward convicted drug dealer; evidence not sufficient that crime committed. State v. McNeal, 262 Kan. 551, 940 P.2d 34 (1997).
|
|