KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

This website has moved to KSRevisor.gov


 
   

 




21-3814.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3814; L. 1970, ch. 124, § 6; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 158; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 107; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Section construed; no entrapment where defendant knew the officers involved were police officers; conviction affirmed. State v. Jones, 2 Kan. App. 2d 220, 577 P.2d 357.

2. State not required to notify defendant of forfeiture of bond to establish willfulness; section compared with K.S.A. 22-2807. State v. Rodgers, 225 Kan. 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 589 P.2d 981.

3. Conviction hereunder; former attorney permitted to testify about having given notice to defendant on required court appearance. State v. Breazeale, 11 Kan. App. 2d 103, 713 P.2d 973 (1986).

4. Conviction reversed; effect of diversion agreement on appearance bond, notice of trial date where diversion agreement violated examined. State v. Chappell, 11 Kan. App. 2d 546, 729 P.2d 1241 (1986).

5. Aggravated failure to appear offense not dependent on outcome of underlying charge. State v. DeAtley, 11 Kan. App. 2d 605, 611, 731 P.2d 318 (1987).

6. One cannot be charged with aggravated failure to appear for being absent at a probation revocation proceeding. State v. Miller, 15 Kan. App. 2d 566, 572, 811 P.2d 1256 (1991).

7. Felony charge, not felony conviction, is an essential element of aggravated failure to appear. State v. Rapp, 26 Kan. App. 2d 595, 992 P.2d 226 (1999).

8. Failure to appear to pretrial services as part of release from custody on appearance bond may be charged as aggravated failure to appear. State v. Floyd, 29 Kan. App. 2d 833, 32 P.3d 1217 (2001).

9. District court declared forfeiture of bail; defendant bound over for trial on aggravated failure to appear. State v. Jones, 38 Kan. App. 2d 924, 926, 927, 173 P.3d 1179 (2008).

10. Evidence sufficient to support conviction for aggravated failure to appear despite reliance upon attorney's mistaken advice that appearance at hearing was unnecessary. State v. Diaz, 44 Kan. App. 2d 870, 241 P.3d 1018 (2010).


 



This website has moved to KSRevisor.gov