21-3717.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3717; Repealed, L. 1992, ch. 298, § 97; Repealed, L. 1993, ch. 291, § 283; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
21-2437.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Possession of burglary tools and attempted burglary separate and distinct offenses; conviction hereunder affirmed. State v. Cory, 211 Kan. 528, 506 P.2d 1115.
2. Acquittal on charge of theft did not preclude charge hereunder; no double jeopardy. State v. Pruitt, 216 Kan. 103, 106, 531 P.2d 860.
3. Warrantless arrest under K.S.A. K.S.A. 22-2401 upheld; admission of evidence and instructions approved. State v. Curtis, 217 Kan. 717, 538 P.2d 1383.
4. Officer's testimony as to what certain tool is normally used for held admissible. State v. Hernandez, 222 Kan. 175, 563 P.2d 474.
5. Intent to commit burglary may be inferred from circumstances at time of arrest. State v. Brocato, 222 Kan. 201, 203, 204, 563 P.2d 470.
6. Validity of warrantless arrest not dependent on whether later issued warrant was valid; consolidation of trials not prejudicial. State v. Boster, 4 Kan. App. 2d 355, 606 P.2d 1035.
7. Crime hereunder compared with crimes under drug paraphernalia act. State v. Dunn, 233 Kan. 411, 415, 662 P.2d 1286 (1983).
8. Cited in holding legislative intent is imposition of mandatory minimum sentence when firearm used, K.S.A. 21-4618. State v. Keeley, 236 Kan. 555, 558, 694 P.2d 422 (1985).
|
|