21-3711.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3711; L. 1971, ch. 107, § 2; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 109; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 71; L. 1996, ch. 157, § 2; L. 1997, ch. 66, § 1; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Source or Prior Law:
21-604, 21-605, 34-295c, 41-509, 79-316a, 79-3320.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
Consumer protection in the Tenth Judicial District, William P. Coates, Jr., 44 J.B.A.K. 67, 70, 105 (1975).
"'Notarize This': The Notary's and the Lawyer's Liability for Forged Signatures," J. Nick Badgerow, 73 J.K.B.A. No. 8, 18, 22 (2004).
Attorney General's Opinions:
Delinquent tax collection; poverty affidavit limiting issuance or execution of tax warrant. 91-34.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Referred to in construing Campaign Finance Act. State v. Doyen, 224 Kan. 482, 489, 580 P.2d 1351.
2. Dismissal of charges upheld; failure to grant speedy trial. State v. Cuezze, Houston & Faltico, 225 Kan. 274, 279, 589 P.2d 626.
3. Error to dismiss count against one defendant on grounds of improper venue. State v. Cuezze, Houston & Faltico, 225 Kan. 274, 279, 589 P.2d 626.
4. Conviction upheld; defendant properly convicted under either a single or multiple larceny theory. State v. Stoops, 4 Kan. App. 2d 130, 131, 603 P.2d 221.
5. Judgment reversed; evidence insufficient to establish elements of the offense. State v. Conner, 4 Kan. App. 2d 207, 208, 209, 603 P.2d 1038.
6. Conviction hereunder; aiding and abetting the making of false writing by delivery, consolidation for trial, venue discussed. State v. Reineking, 10 Kan. App. 2d 630, 631, 706 P.2d 483 (1985).
7. Statute not unconstitutionally vague or ambiguous where false bank loan extension intended to prevent official action. State v. Kee, 238 Kan. 342, 353, 711 P.2d 746 (1985).
8. Instruction defining "material," instruction on attempted false writing, sufficiency of evidence, sentencing examined. State v. Roberts-Reid, 238 Kan. 788, 714 P.2d 971 (1986).
9. Statute not in violation of 14 th Amendment nor section 10 of Kansas Bill of Rights. State v. Ward, 11 Kan. App. 2d 147, 716 P.2d 594 (1986).
10. Theft of public assistance as continuing offense, applicability of statute of limitations, misrepresentations as "willfully false" examined. State v. Jones, 13 Kan. App. 2d 520, 521, 775 P.2d 183 (1989).
11. General statute inapplicable when welfare fraud (K.S.A. 39-720) charged. State v. Wilcox, 245 Kan. 76, 78, 775 P.2d 177 (1989).
12. Applicability of K.S.A. 39-720 to all charges brought under programs administered by SRS examined. State v. Jones, 246 Kan. 180, 787 P.2d 738 (1990).
13. Giving worthless check covered by specific statute, K.S.A. 21-3707; conviction hereunder reversed. State v. Montgomery, 14 Kan. App. 2d 577, 796 P.2d 559 (1990).
14. False writing made to appear as produced by another covered in K.S.A. 21-3710; other false writings covered herein. State v. Rios, 246 Kan. 517, 530, 792 P.2d 1065 (1990).
15. What constitutes the crime of making a false writing outlined; acts necessary to constitute concealment examined. State v. Palmer, 248 Kan. 681, 691, 810 P.2d 734 (1991).
16. Knowledge is essential element and means actual information that material matter is falsely stated; material information discussed. State v. Edwards, 250 Kan. 320, 321, 324, 328, 330, 826 P.2d 1355 (1992).
17. Cited in holding court lacked jurisdiction to convict father of rape of 15 year-old daughter where father also convicted of aggravated kidnapping. Carmichael v. State, 18 Kan. App. 2d 435, 442, 856 P.2d 934 (1993).
18. Dismissal of false writing charges for lack of evidence at preliminary examination upheld. State v. Kraushaar, 264 Kan. 667, 668, 957 P.2d 1106 (1998).
19. Evidence of insurance fraud was sufficient to convict defendant of making a false writing. State v. Smith, 268 Kan. 222, 225, 241, 993 P.2d 1213 (1999).
20. Defendant should have been charged with forgery not making false information (store clerk prepared merchandise receipt using another clerk's name). State v. Gotti, 273 Kan. 459, 43 P.3d 812 (2002).
21. Cited in opinion holding defendant's statements properly suppressed because unfair law enforcement conduct rendered statements involuntary. State v. Morton, 286 Kan. 632, 635, 186 P.3d 785 (2008).
|
|