Printable Format17-1225.
History: L. 1929, ch. 140, § 3; L. 1935, ch. 129, § 3; L. 1941, ch. 177, § 2; L. 1955, ch. 137, § 1; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 145, § 23; July 1.
Source or Prior Law:
17-1213.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Testimony of other sales held proper as negativing isolated sale. State v. Harper, 137 Kan. 696, 22 P.2d 454.
2. Cited with approval along with similar statutes from other states. Kneeland v. Emerton, 280 Mass. 371, 390, 183 N.E. 155, 164.
3. Distribution of patronage refund certificates by cooperative marketing association exempt; exemptions will be strictly construed. State, ex rel., v. Consumers Co-operative Ass'n, 163 Kan. 324, 362, 183 P.2d 423.
4. Isolated sale exemption must be alleged and proved by person claiming benefit thereof. Zehring v. Foster, 184 Kan. 599, 601, 602, 339 P.2d 331.
5. Sales of securities in form of working interests in oil and gas leases exempt under act; isolated transactions hereunder. Elting v. Pickett, 190 Kan. 54, 62, 63, 64, 372 P.2d 261.
6. Sales of stock in holding company held not within section. Cities Service Co. v. Koeneke, 137 Kan. 7, 14, 27, 20 P.2d 460.
7. Evidence held sufficient to support conclusion sales were not "isolated sales." State v. Barr, 144 Kan. 256, 258, 59 P.2d 33.
8. Mentioned in holding evidence of sale and agency insufficient to sustain conviction. State v. Svoboda, 147 Kan. 245, 246, 76 P.2d 814.
9. Person conspiring in successive sales under act although directly connected only with one sale. Mosley v. Unruh, 150 Kan. 469, 474, 95 P.2d 537.
10. Seller held broker without license and sale voidable under K.S.A. 17-1240. Setchell v. Moore, 89 F.2d 236, 239.
11. Transaction involving less than "one-twenty-fifth" interest held not sale under evidence. State v. Svoboda, 147 Kan. 245, 246, 76 P.2d 814.