Printable Format

Previous | Next

Source or Prior Law:

L. 1866, ch. 57, § 17; G.S. 1868, ch. 23, § 24; L. 1898, ch. 10, § 12; L. 1901, ch. 125, § 3; L. 1907, ch. 140, § 29.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cases concerning bar to suit when statute not complied with: Northrup v. Wills, 65 Kan. 769, 770, 70 P. 879; Thomas v. Remington, 67 Kan. 599, 604, 73 P. 909; Swift v. Platte, 68 Kan. 1, 4, 72 P. 271, 74 P. 635; Commission Co. v. Haston, 68 Kan. 749, 754, 75 P. 1028; Osborne & Company v. Shilling, 68 Kan. 808, 74 P. 609; Jordan v. Telegraph Co., 69 Kan. 140, 141, 143, 76 P. 396; Deere v. Wyland, 69 Kan. 255, 256, 76 P. 863; Powder Mills v. Kemp, 69 Kan. 846, 76 P. 1128; Wooster v. Crane & Company, 69 Kan. 850, 76 P. 1131; Vickers v. Buck, 70 Kan. 584, 585, 79 P. 160, Keizer v. Remington, 71 Kan. 305, 306, 80 P. 570; Elliott v. Parlin, 71 Kan. 665, 673, 81 P. 500; Leonard v. Steele Co., 73 Kan. 79, 80, 81, 84 P. 553; Osborne v. Shilling, 74 Kan. 675, 676, 88 P. 258; Thrasher Co. v. Riggs, 75 Kan. 518, 520, 89 P. 921; Torpedo Co. v. Petroleum Co., 75 Kan. 530, 531, 533, 89 P. 913; The State v. Telegraph Co., 75 Kan. 609, 617, 90 P. 299 (Reversed: Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas, 216 U.S. 1, 30 S. Ct. 190, 54 L. Ed 355); Boggs v. Kelly, 76 Kan. 9, 10, 90 P. 765; Stock Food Co. v. Jasper, 76 Kan. 926, 927, 92 P. 1094; Wilson v. Bank, 77 Kan. 589, 590, 594, 95 P. 404; Wilson v. Hawkins, 80 Kan. 117, 118, 101 P. 1009 (Reversed: Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. Hawkins, 223 U.S. 713, 32 S. Ct. 520, 56 L. Ed. 625); Hessig v. Sly, 83 Kan. 60, 61, 109 P. 770.

2. Single transaction may constitute a doing of business; constitutionality. Deere v. Wyland, 69 Kan. 255, 256, 76 P. 863.

3. Acts which constitute doing of business by foreign corporation considered. Thomas v. Remington, 67 Kan. 599, 604, 73 P. 909; Commission Co. v. Haston, 68 Kan. 749, 754, 75 P. 1028; Deere v. Wyland, 69 Kan. 255, 256, 76 P. 863; Elliott v. Parlin, 71 Kan. 665, 672, 673, 81 P. 500; Osborne v. Shilling, 74 Kan. 675, 676, 88 P. 258; Boggs v. Kelly, 76 Kan. 9, 10, 90 P. 765.

4. Section applies to corporations engaged in interstate commerce. Wilson v. Hawkins, 80 Kan. 117, 118, 101 P. 1009. Reversed: Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. Hawkins, 223 U.S. 713, 32 S. Ct. 520, 56 L. Ed. 625.

5. Goods to be shipped into state, not doing business hereunder. Hessig v. Sly, 83 Kan. 60, 61, 109 P. 770.

6. Requiring of statement before bringing suit in courts held unconstitutional. International Text Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91, 30 S. Ct. 481, 54 L. Ed. 678; Buck Stove Co. v. Vickers, 226 U.S. 205, 33 S. Ct. 41, 57 L. Ed. 189.

7. Application of act to corporations engaged in interstate commerce considered; corporation operated by receiver must pay statutory fees. The State, ex rel., v. Sessions, 95 Kan. 272, 275, 147 P. 789. Affirmed: Railway Co. v. Kansas, 245 U.S. 627, 38 S. Ct. 60, 62 L. Ed. 518.

8. Foreign corporation having same privileges as domestic subject to tax. Lusk v. Sessions, 95 Kan. 271, 147 P. 794. Affirmed: Lusk v. Kansas, 240 U.S. 236, 36 S. Ct. 263, 60 L. Ed. 621.

9. Secretary of state's method of computing tax held valid. Champlin Refining Co. v. Ryan, 147 Kan. 160, 161, 165, 166, 167, 75 P.2d 245.

10. Company organized as express trust under Oklahoma law, foreign corporation in Kansas; requirements imposed. State, ex rel., v. United Royalty Co., 188 Kan. 443, 445, 447, 461, 363 P.2d 397.