14-428.
History: R.S. 1923, § 14-428; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 84, § 1; July 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1862, ch. 46, art. 2, § 1, ¶¶ 7, 8; L. 1864, ch. 69, § 2, ¶¶ 7, 8; L. 1867, ch. 68, art. 3, § 2, ¶¶ 7, 8; G.S. 1868, ch. 19, § 30, ¶¶ 7, 8; L. 1871, ch. 62, § 43; L. 1872, ch. 100, § 60; L. 1911, ch. 116, § 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. When hog pens become a nuisance considered. City of Burlington v. Stockwell, 5 Kan. App. 569, 571, 47 P. 988.
2. Hog pens as nuisance; no defense that pens kept clean. City of Burlington v. Stockwell, 5 Kan. App. 569, 571, 47 P. 988.
3. Other nuisance existing in same neighborhood, no defense. City of Burlington v. Stockwell, 5 Kan. App. 569, 571, 47 P. 988.
4. City cannot divert stream where private owner could not. City of Emporia v. Soden, 26 Kan. 492, 493.
5. Condemnation of land does not carry right to use water. City of Emporia v. Soden, 26 Kan. 492, 493.
6. Police power extended only over lands used for purposes designated. The State, ex rel., v. Franklin, 40 Kan. 410, 411, 19 P. 801.
7. Police jurisdiction does not extend to stockyards outside city. The State, ex rel., v. Franklin, 40 Kan. 410, 411, 19 P. 801.
8. Extent of jurisdiction which city may assume outside limits considered. The State, ex rel., v. Franklin, 40 Kan. 410, 411, 19 P. 801.
9. City has power to provide for supplying itself with water. Waterworks Co. v. City of Burlington, 43 Kan. 725, 728, 23 P. 1068.
10. Levy of "waterworks-contract tax" held not invalid. Manley v. Emlin, 46 Kan. 655, 659, 27 P. 844.
11. Power of city to contract for water considered. Manley v. Emlin, 46 Kan. 655, 659, 27 P. 844.
12. Power of city to contract for water considered; tax limitation. Waterworks Co. v. City of Columbus, 48 Kan. 99, 101, 28 P. 1097.
13. Contract for illegal duration, partly performed, upheld for reasonable period. Waterworks Co. v. City of Columbus, 48 Kan. 99, 101, 28 P. 1097.
14. Liability of city for services and property taken during epidemic. City of McPherson v. Nichols, 48 Kan. 430, 432, 29 P. 679.
15. Contract with waterworks company; election to purchase; rescission; estoppel. Water Co. v. Cherryvale, 65 Kan. 219, 227, 69 P. 176.
16. City may extend system over six miles beyond city limits. Hibbard v. Barker, 84 Kan. 848, 115 P. 561.
17. Matters of mere municipal policy not for courts to control. Hibbard v. Barker, 84 Kan. 848, 115 P. 561.
18. Ordinance prohibiting all garbage on city lots unreasonable and invalid. City of Goodland v. Popejoy, 98 Kan. 183, 184, 157 P. 410.
19. Water used for water power, measure of damages when diverted. Wallace v. City of Winfield, 98 Kan. 651, 655, 159 P. 11.
20. Previous condemnation for waterworks does not bar later condemnation. Wallace v. City of Winfield, 98 Kan. 651, 655, 159 P. 11.
21. City ordinance pertaining to confiscation of automobiles held repugnant to state law. Sate v. Hannigan, 161 Kan. 492, 495, 497, 170 P.2d 138.
22. Penal ordinance regulating soliciting void for unlawful classification and discriminatory nature. City of Derby v. Hiegert, 183 Kan. 68, 69, 325 P.2d 35.
|
|