KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

9-207.

History: L. 1909, ch. 61, § 7; L. 1911, ch. 61, § 2; R.S. 1923, § 9-207; Repealed, L. 1929, ch. 89, § 1; March 14.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Original contract rate of interest between bank and depositor governs. Davis v. Bank Commissioner, 105 Kan. 560, 185 P. 41.

2. Effect of contracting for interest upon deposit considered. Davis v. Bank Commissioner, 105 Kan. 560, 563, 185 P. 41.

3. Effect of contracting for higher rate of interest considered. State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 520, 528, 204 P. 709.

4. Opinion of bank commissioner does not bind the guaranty fund. State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 520, 204 P. 709.

5. Bonus paid by third party not deemed excessive interest. Mortgage Trust Co. v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 786, 790, 791, 205 P. 610.

6. Section held not to have been violated; claim sustained. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490.

7. Contemporaneous agreement; depositor held entitled to participate in guaranty fund. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490.

8. Rate of interest on face of certificate legal; claim sustained. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490.

9. Deposit bearing excessive rate of interest is not within act. Koelling v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 109, 111, 216 P. 1099.

10. Certificate objected to because of date of maturity held to be within fund. Reserve State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 117 Kan. 186, 187, 230 P. 1056.

11. Statute disavows state's responsibility for system. State, ex rel., v. Bone, 125 Kan. 818, 839, 266 P. 85.

12. Deposit subject to check bearing excess interest not within fund. Barber County v. Bank Commissioner, 113 Kan. 180, 189, 213 P. 1054; Burnaman v. Bank Commissioner, 117 Kan. 612, 615, 232 P. 1048.

13. Only deposit of money or its equivalent protected by fund. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 1, 5, 216 P. 1093.

14. Certificate of deposit in form set out held not to be within fund. Barrett v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 804, 223 P. 1091.

15. Depositors do not lose right in fund by suing bank officers. Ramsey v. Bank Commissioner, 115 Kan. 212, 222 P. 117.

16. Fact that security is inadequate will not bring it within fund. City of Osawatomie v. Bone, 121 Kan. 545, 247 P. 432.

17. Transaction examined and held not to constitute deposit. Peoples Bank v. Bone, 121 Kan. 768, 773, 250 P. 276.

18. Money or equivalent of money necessary to create deposit. Lloyd v. Butler County State Bank, 122 Kan. 835, 253 P. 906.


 | Next


LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL
  7/30/2024 Meeting Notice
  7/09/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  6/03/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  LCC Policies

REVISOR OF STATUTES
  Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
  Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act
  Gannon v. State
  A Summary of Special Sessions in Kansas
  Bill Brief for Senate Bill No. 1
  Bill Brief for House Bill No. 2001
  Information for Special Session 2021
  General Info., Legal Analysis & Research
  2023 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2022 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2021 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2020 Amended & repealed Statutes
  2019 Amended & Repealed Statutes

USEFUL LINKS
Session Laws

OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES
Kansas Legislature
Administrative Services
Division of Post Audit
Research Department