9-201.
History: L. 1909, ch. 61, § 1; L. 1921, ch. 73, § 1; R.S. 1923, § 9-201; Repealed, L. 1929, ch. 89, § 1; March 14.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Application of law to national banks considered, but not decided. The State v. Dolley, 82 Kan. 533, 108 P. 846; The State v. Dolley, 83 Kan. 80, 109 P. 992.
2. State law requiring contribution to guaranty fund not unconstitutional. Assaria State Bank v. Dolley, 219 U.S. 121, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 123.
3. Law making contribution voluntary may still be police regulation. Assaria State Bank v. Dolley, 219 U.S. 121, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 123.
4. Act held constitutional and valid; all objections raised overruled. Assaria State Bank v. Dolley, 219 U.S. 121, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 123.
5. Act held not unconstitutional as against national banks. Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U.S. 1, 33 S. Ct. 409, 57 L. Ed. 707.
6. Statutes do not forbid competitors of national banks to succeed. Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U.S. 1, 33 S. Ct. 409, 57 L. Ed. 707.
7. General design of law discussed. State, ex rel., v. Bone, 120 Kan. 620, 621, 244 P. 852.
8. Violation of banking laws by bank does not deprive depositors of right. Labette County Comm'rs v. Bone, 120 Kan. 673, 245 P. 123.
9. Certificates of deposit are subject to reformation. Castern v. Kreipe, 125 Kan. 182, 264 P. 55.
10. Repeal of act upheld; return of bonds denied. Smith v. Koenecke, 128 Kan. 805, 280 P. 767.
11. Cited in discussing South Dakota law. State v. Smith, 58 S.D. 22, 234 N.W. 764, 766.
12. Bank-guarantee law and speculative-securities act compared. Meyers v. State Corporation Comm., 139 Kan. 890, 894, 33 P.2d 308.
|
|