Printable Format79-2906.
History: L. 1876, ch. 34, § 153; R.S. 1923, 79-2906; Repealed, L. 1941, ch. 375, § 35; September 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Abbreviated description of Indian lands held not void. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co. v. Johnson, 23 Kan. 717, 720, 721.
2. Description in tax deed held insufficient to cover any land. Wilkins v. Tourtellott, 28 Kan. 825, 843. Modified: Wilkins v. Tourtellott, 29 Kan. 513.
3. Tract held sufficiently described when reading entire deed. Dodge v. Emmons, 34 Kan. 732, 737, 9 P. 951.
4. Lot in an addition to a city held sufficiently described. Knote v. Caldwell, 43 Kan. 464, 468, 23 P. 625.
5. Tract assessed cannot be determined; indefinite; tax lien not allowed. Harding v. Greene, 59 Kan. 202, 205, 52 P. 436.
6. Popular name of town used in describing lot; held sufficient. Goodrow v. Stober, 80 Kan. 597, 599, 102 P. 1089.
7. Section applied; resort may be had to extrinsic evidence. Herod v. Carter, 81 Kan. 236, 239, 106 P. 32.
8. Indefinite description in tax deed; extrinsic evidence held not admissible. Townsend v. Mallory, 94 Kan. 297, 299, 146 P. 318.