79-2410.
History: L. 1876, ch. 34, § 137; L. 1905, ch. 499, § 1; R.S. 1923, 79-2410; L. 1939, ch. 325, § 1; Repealed, L. 1941, ch. 375, § 35; September 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1862, ch. 198, § 9; L. 1866, ch. 118, § 88; G.S. 1868, ch. 107, § 110.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Commissioners may designate who shall publish notice and redemption list. Petillon v. Comm'rs of Ford Co., 5 Kan. App. 794, 796, 48 P. 1002.
2. Notice should not contain charges not provided for by statute. Casner v. Gahlman, 6 Kan. App. 295, 297, 51 P. 56.
3. Omission from notice of person to whom land assessed; effect. Shoup v. C. B. U. P. Rld. Co., 24 Kan. 547, 562.
4. Inaccuracy in statement of amount due held not fatal. Watkins v. Inge, 24 Kan. 612, 617.
5. Notice for redemption published while land held by county valid. Board of Regents v. Linscott, 30 Kan. 240, 262, 1 P. 81.
6. Deed invalid where notice not specific, definite or correct. Blackstone v. Sherwood, 31 Kan. 35, 36, 2 P. 874.
7. Notice failing to allow sufficient time for redemption held invalid; computation of time when last day falls on Sunday. English v. Williamson, 34 Kan. 212, 8 P. 214.
8. Failure to post notice fatal to tax deed. Stout v. Coates, Assignee, 35 Kan. 382, 385, 387, 11 P. 151.
9. Notice insufficient where sufficient time not allowed; tax deed voidable. Hill v. Timmermeyer, 36 Kan. 252, 253, 13 P. 211.
10. Treasurer presumed to do his duty in posting notice. Washington v. Hosp, 43 Kan. 324, 325, 23 P. 564.
11. Failure to post notices held to invalidate tax deed. Choat v. Phelps, 63 Kan. 762, 766, 66 P. 1002.
12. Notice stating excessive amount for redemption; deed voidable; tender unnecessary. Shinkle v. Meek, 69 Kan. 368, 369, 76 P. 837; Gibson v. McClees, 86 Kan. 254, 256, 119 P. 870.
13. Redemption notice relating to several lots; illegality; tax deeds invalidated. Wolf v. Wolf, 88 Kan. 205, 209, 128 P. 374.
14. Provisions concerning amount of taxes, etc., is free from ambiguity. Harp v. Wilson, 84 Kan. 45, 46, 113 P. 309.
15. Amount stated less than amount required to redeem; notice invalid. Cave v. Rinehart, 87 Kan. 81, 82, 123 P. 766.
16. Redemption notice not in conformity with statute; interest illegal. Clark v. Tandy, 101 Kan. 328, 329, 167 P. 1039.
17. Notice should not include delinquent tax of preceding year. Jones v. Harper, 102 Kan. 539, 171 P. 655.
18. Failure to post required notices renders tax deed voidable. Pickett v. Frazier, 116 Kan. 456, 227 P. 368.
19. Discussed in construing 1939 tax moratorium law (K.S.A. 79-2415, 79-2416). Iola B. & L. Ass'n v. Allen County Comm'rs, 152 Kan. 365, 370, 103 P.2d 788.
|
|