Printable Format68-1110.
History: L. 1917, ch. 80, § 10; R.S. 1923, 68-1110; Repealed, L. 1935, ch. 250, § 1; March 6.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Purpose for which guardrails required on bridges considered and decided. Dent v. Jefferson County Comm'rs, 118 Kan. 519, 521, 235 P. 873; Grier v. Marshall County Comm'rs, 128 Kan. 95, 96, 276 P. 56.
2. Galvanized conduit regarded as being a "culvert." Arnold v. Coffey County Comm'rs, 131 Kan. 343, 345, 291 P. 762.
3. Culvert off center of road as defect creating liability considered. Houdashelt v. State Highway Comm., 137 Kan. 485, 489, 21 P.2d 343.
4. Sufficiency of guardrails required, discussed. Borman v. State Highway Comm., 139 Kan. 540, 548, 552, 32 P.2d 457.
5. Discussed; petition held to state cause of action under K.S.A. 68-301. Thompson v. Morris County Comm'rs, 170 Kan. 74, 76, 223 P.2d 749.