61-907.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 81, § 119; R.S. 1923, 61-907; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-2606; January 1, 1970.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Certificate of justice; statute must be substantially complied with. Hamilton v. Thomson, 3 K.A. 8, 13, 44 P. 437.
2. Abstract is sufficient; full transcript unnecessary. Treptow v. Buse, 10 K. 170, 176; Honce v. Schram, 73 K. 368, 371, 85 P. 535.
3. Judgment has same effect as though originally rendered in district court. Rahm v. Soper, 28 K. 529, 530; Honce v. Schram, 73 K. 368, 371, 85 P. 535.
4. Justice has no jurisdiction to issue process after judgment transferred. Rahm v. Soper, 28 K. 529, 530.
5. Omission of dollar marks and punctuation points; abstract not necessarily void. Dickens v. Crane, 33 K. 344, 349, 6 P. 630.
6. Abstract insufficient to transfer judgment from one county to another. Hubbard v. Jones, 61 K. 722, 723, 60 P. 743.
7. Filing of transcript imparts notice; evidence of filing of transcript. Bliss v. Brown, 78 K. 467, 476, 96 P. 945.
8. Abstract certified by clerk city court; presumption of regularity. Hendrickson v. Sheetz, 112 K. 296, 297, 210 P. 1109.
9. Judgment becomes lien on real estate only, not on personalty. Staker v. Gillen, 143 K. 212, 214, 53 P.2d 821.
10. City court judgment filed in district court creates lien on real estate only. Metz v. Williams, 149 K. 647, 649, 88 P.2d 1093.