50-132. Conspiring to monopolize line of business or to prevent producer or local buyer from shipping without agency of third person. No person, servant, agent or employee of any person doing business within the state of Kansas shall conspire or combine with any other persons, within or without the state for the purpose of monopolizing any line of business, or shall conspire or combine for the purpose of preventing the producer of grain, seeds or livestock or hay, or the local buyer thereof, from shipping or marketing the same without the agency of any third person.
History: L. 1899, ch. 293, § 2; R.S. 1923, 50-132; L. 2000, ch. 136, § 15; July 1.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
Compared to Clayton-Sherman Acts in article on Kansas antitrust law, Kenton C. Granger, 8 W.L.J. 1, 5, 6, 9, 12 (1968).
Attorney General's Opinions:
Contracts; restraint of trade; non-compete contract clause. 95-60.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Foreign corporations may forfeit license by violations. The State v. Harvester Co., 81 Kan. 610, 106 P. 1053.
2. Cited; allegations of antitrust violations against provider's threatened termination of contracting provider agreement with hospital examined. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 1287, 1333 (1986).
|