Printable Format43-123.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 54, § 26; L. 1876, ch. 104, § 6; L. 1899, ch. 121, § 1; L. 1901, ch. 236, § 1; L. 1907, ch. 230, § 1; R.S. 1923, 43-123; Repealed, L. 1971, ch. 176, § 22; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. If regular panel reduced, additional jurors to be summoned. Trembly v. The State, 20 K. 116, 118; The State v. Simons, 61 K. 752, 60 P. 1052; The State v. Davis, 67 K. 545, 73 P. 87.
2. When challenge to array sustained, additional jurors to be summoned. The State v. Skinner, 34 K. 256, 268, 8 P. 420.
3. When no objection raised, presumption defendant waived irregularity in jury. The State v. Taylor, 36 K. 329, 332, 13 P. 550. Questioned: State v. Harris, 103 K. 347, 350, 175 P. 153.
4. Court may complete panel from among bystanders, when. The State v. Geary, 58 K. 502, 506, 49 P. 596.
5. Empty jury box insufficient reason for summons of talesmen. The State v. Edwards, 64 K. 455, 456, 67 P. 834.
6. When panel incomplete, duty of district judge to select names. The State v. Schmidt, 74 K. 627, 87 P. 742; The State v. Simons, 61 K. 752, 60 P. 1052.
7. Presence of justice of the peace not necessary in second drawing. The State v. Thurston, 77 K. 522, 525, 94 P. 1011.
8. Duties prescribed are within scope of office of district judge. Moore v. Nation, 80 K. 672, 677, 103 P. 107.
9. Irregularities may be cured by ordering new panel. State v. Lightfoot, 118 K. 428, 235 P. 843.
10. Prejudice prevalent in defendant's community, court may refuse jurors therefrom. State v. Waldron, 118 K. 641, 236 P. 855.
11. Court order limiting panel to jurors resident outside defendant's township valid. State v. Hooper, 140 K. 481, 495, 37 P.2d 52.
12. Organization of grand jury discussed and jury held legal. State v. Millhaubt, 144 K. 574, 577, 61 P.2d 1356.