34-103.
History: L. 1915, ch. 229, § 4; L. 1917, ch. 203, § 3; L. 1919, ch. 285, § 5; L. 1920, ch. 63, § 1; R.S. 1923, 34-103; L. 1925, ch. 179, § 1; L. 1931, ch. 193, § 1; L. 1933, ch. 189, § 6; L. 1937, ch. 331, § 4; L. 1939, ch. 298, § 2; L. 1943, ch. 175, § 1; L. 1945, ch. 209, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 260, § 1; L. 1951, ch. 285, § 1; L. 1955, ch. 232, § 3; L. 1957, ch. 252, § 1; L. 1959, ch. 195, § 1; L. 1962, ch. 34, § 1; Repealed, L. 1967, ch. 226, § 2; April 25.
Source or prior law:
L. 1891, ch. 248, § 18; L. 1897, ch. 138, § 9; L. 1901, ch. 192, § 1; L. 1903, ch. 325, § 4; L. 1907, ch. 222, § 8; L. 1911, ch. 199, § 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Appropriation for expense of grain inspector held valid. Hicks v. Davis, 97 Kan. 312, 154 P. 1030.